← Back to Scenarios
Debate: Critical Thinking in the Age of AI
In this workshop, students (13-16) engage in structured debates on critical AI issues. From algorithmic bias in hiring to the ethics of facial recognition in schools, they learn to research, argue persuasively, and think critically about the technology shaping their future.
Resources & Downloads
Download the PDF versions of this scenario or the associated presentation and rubrics.
Working Editable Documents
These editable source files are provided as working documents for teachers.
Target Group: 13 - 16 y.o.
Activity Duration: 60 min
Key Learning Goals:
- Critical Thinking: Empower participants to think critically and ethically about AI.
- Research Skills: Develop the ability to find and evaluate information from age-appropriate sources.
- Civic Engagement: Engage thoughtfully in societal discussions about technology.
- Communication: Present arguments clearly and listen attentively to opposing viewpoints.
Learning Outcomes
Students will be able to:
KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING:
- Define basic AI concepts (algorithms, chatbots) and ethical viewpoints.
- Identify potential benefits and risks of AI in contexts like healthcare, jobs, and education.
SKILLS & ABILITIES:
- Conduct independent research to support arguments with evidence.
- Distinguish between facts and opinions, and identify bias.
- Work effectively in a team to develop a debate strategy.
ATTITUDES & VALUES:
- Demonstrate curiosity about the impact of technology on society.
- Value ethical considerations and diverse perspectives.
European Dimension / Erasmus+ Connection
- EU Values: Framing topics around democracy, human rights, and privacy (GDPR).
- Cross-Border Collaboration: Opportunities for joint debates with European partner schools.
- Digital Citizenship: Addressing the role of AI in misinformation and democratic processes.
1. Resources and Tools
Required Materials:
- Debate Guide: Infographic on "Team Policy Debate" (in zip).
- Presentation: Intro Slides (PPT in zip).
- Assessment: Judging Rubric & Self-Evaluation Form (in zip).
- Tech: Computers for research, Padlet for audience voting.
Useful Links:
Classroom Support Materials:
- Prepare a debate checklist, printed role cards, and a visible timer for each debate round.
2. Working Methods
- Team-Based Learning: Collaborative research and argument development.
- Inquiry-Based Learning: Independent exploration of complex ethical questions.
- Active Learning: Role-playing and structured debate rounds.
Activity Overview
| Phase |
Duration |
Activity |
Description |
| Intro |
10 min |
Setting the Stage |
Introduction to the topic (video/story). Forming teams (Affirmative, Negative, Judges). |
| Prep |
20 min |
Research & Strategy |
Teams research online sources, use digital tools, and prepare constructive/rebuttal speeches. |
| Action |
20 min |
The Debate |
Online or live team policy debate. Emphasis on respectful communication and etiquette. |
| Reflection |
10 min |
Evaluation |
Judges score teams. Audience votes on Padlet. Self-assessment and class discussion. |
3. Topics for Debate
Topic A: AI in Education
"Should AI be used to monitor students in schools?"
- Context: It is 2035. Schools use facial recognition to detect stress or attention. Is this safety or invasion of privacy?
"Should schools teach students how to use AI tools?"
- Context: Should we ban ChatGPT or teach students to use it responsibly like a calculator?
Topic B: AI and Ethics
"Should decisions about patient care be made by AI?"
- Context: A robot diagnoses you instantly. It's fast, but does it understand empathy?
"Should AI decide who gets a job?"
- Context: An algorithm rejects your CV. Is it unbiased, or did it learn bias from humans?
Topic C: AI in Everyday Life
"Should AI control what we see on social media?"
- Context: Algorithms curate our feeds. Does this create "bubbles" or keep us entertained?
4. Creative Application (The Debate)
Structure of the Round
- Constructive Speeches: Presenting the main case (Affirmative vs. Negative).
- Cross-Examination: One student questions the opponent directly.
- Rebuttal: Refuting the opponent's arguments and defending your own.
5. Reflection and Evaluation
Assessment Criteria
- Arguments (30%): Quality and clarity of claims.
- Evidence (25%): Use of credible sources.
- Delivery (20%): Persuasiveness and eye contact.
- Rebuttals (15%) & Teamwork (10%).